Why Doubt the Academic Degree (LL.B.) of Chief Minister Dr Himanta Biswa Sarma?
Heramba Nath
In the ever-evolving narrative of Assam’s history, few leaders have managed to combine political astuteness with intellectual depth as seamlessly as Dr Himanta Biswa Sarma. His journey from student leader to advocate, from minister to Chief Minister of Assam, is both inspiring and emblematic of a broader story of resilience and vision. It is, therefore, bewildering that questions continue to surface regarding his academic background—particularly his Bachelor of Laws (LL.B.) degree and postgraduate studies. Such doubts, largely fuelled by political undercurrents or personal jealousy, seem far removed from reality and evidence. They not only cast aspersions on the credentials of an accomplished leader but also undermine the credibility of the institutions that conferred those degrees.
The allegation that Dr Sarma does not possess an LL.B. degree is both illogical and baseless when viewed through the lens of India’s legal system. The journey to becoming an advocate in any State Bar Council is governed by stringent regulations. The Advocates Act, 1961, along with the Bar Council of India’s regulatory framework, mandates that every enrolment applicant submit verified documentation of their LL.B. degree from a recognised university. Without this verification, no one can be enrolled—let alone be licensed to practise law. Dr Sarma’s name was duly registered with the Assam State Bar Council, and he practised as an advocate at the Gauhati High Court. Within a short period, Dr Sarma established himself as a reputed advocate of the Gauhati High Court, earning the respect of both his peers and clients through his clarity of thought, sharp legal acumen, and dedication to the profession. To suggest that anyone could have bypassed these checks is to question not only Dr Sarma but also the integrity of India’s entire legal system.
The legal profession in India is far from an informal arena where one can claim to be an advocate without qualification. It is a domain of rigorous scrutiny. Admission to a law course demands academic merit, and the degree itself involves years of study, examinations, and practical training. After graduation, the Bar Council verifies every academic credential before granting the right to practise. Dr Sarma’s career as an advocate was rooted in these very standards. The fact that he argued cases before the Gauhati High Court confirms his credentials, for no court allows unqualified individuals to practise within its premises.
Beyond his law degree, murmurs have arisen regarding his academic qualifications in Political Science, with some alleging he lacks a Master’s degree. This claim collapses under basic scrutiny. Gauhati University, a prestigious institution, would not confer a doctoral degree (PhD) upon someone who did not meet the essential prerequisites. Doctoral programmes are not ceremonial. They require a solid foundation of undergraduate and postgraduate study, a rigorous admission process, submission of a research proposal, and years of dedicated scholarly work under faculty supervision. Questioning Dr Sarma’s academic record, therefore, also questions the integrity of Gauhati University and its esteemed faculty—an unjust and unwise position.
Dr Sarma’s doctoral journey is, in fact, an inspiring testament to commitment. At the time of his PhD in Political Science, he already held ministerial responsibilities. Yet, despite the pressures of public life, he did not sideline his academic pursuits. His active participation in departmental seminars, frequent engagement with faculty, and meticulous preparation of his research work remain fresh in the memories of his contemporaries. His research guide, Professor Dr Niru Hazarika, then Head of the Department of Political Science, once remarked that given his ministerial duties, she did not expect him to attend every seminar. Yet, Dr Sarma attended them with eagerness and dedication. His commitment exemplified that genuine learning knows no barriers of time or circumstance.
In fact, Dr Sarma regularly attended seminars at Gauhati University concerning his thesis, actively engaging with fellow researchers and faculty members. He also delivered lectures based on his doctoral research, contributing meaningfully to academic discussions. He submitted his thesis formally to his supervisor, as is mandated. If he had not fulfilled the academic requirements for a PhD, how could he have received the necessary internal assessments and viva voce evaluation—both compulsory for the conferment of a doctoral degree? Those who question the legitimacy of his PhD conveniently ignore these procedural truths. There is little doubt that such accusations stem not from factual investigation but from a disposition of jealousy and character assassination. Such blame is not only regrettable but deeply disrespectful to academic integrity.
True education is not a mechanical pursuit of degrees. It is the cultivation of intellect, reason, and insight. Dr Sarma epitomises this ideal. His legal education laid the foundation in constitutional principles, and his research in Political Science deepened his grasp of governance, public policy, and social dynamics. These academic experiences are evident in his approach to leadership. Whether reforming the education sector, strengthening healthcare, or launching development projects, his policies reflect a marriage of theoretical insight and practical wisdom.
Success, however, often attracts envy. Dr Sarma’s swift ascent and transformative leadership have made him a target of baseless allegations. Unable to counter his policies, critics choose to question his academic background, hoping to cast doubt in the public mind. Yet, such attempts frequently backfire, for truth has a way of piercing through the fog of misinformation. The people of Assam, who have seen his work and leadership firsthand, understand and trust his credentials. This public faith has propelled him to the state’s highest office.
One might find the comparison with historical figures like Jesus Christ lofty, yet it highlights a universal truth: great individuals often face unjust criticism. During his crucifixion, Jesus said, “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” In a similar vein, one might say that those who cast baseless aspersions on Dr Sarma’s education act not out of reason, but ignorance or jealousy. Responding with calm assurance, rather than indignation, is the mark of a leader who understands the noise but remains committed to the signal.
A distinguishing feature of Dr Sarma’s career is his ability to balance intellectual growth with administrative leadership. For many, politics becomes all-consuming, leaving little room for reflection or scholarship. Dr Sarma defies this norm. His academic background has undeniably enriched his administrative capabilities. Legal training has instilled analytical precision, while Political Science has provided a broader understanding of socio-political dynamics. This rare combination enables him to make bold, well-informed decisions.
While academic qualifications are important, they are not the sole measure of leadership. History bears witness to leaders without advanced degrees who transformed nations through vision and resolve. Conversely, many highly educated individuals have failed to make any meaningful impact. Dr Sarma stands apart as someone who possesses both scholarly depth and transformative action. His story is not just about credentials; it is about how those credentials are applied in service to the people.
The controversy over his academic qualifications, therefore, appears not only groundless but also misplaced. If there are genuine concerns, they should be addressed through institutional mechanisms. Universities, bar councils, and courts maintain detailed records. To engage in public smear campaigns based on hearsay is not only unethical but corrosive to democratic discourse. It degrades public trust in institutions and diverts attention from substantive issues.
Dr Sarma’s tenure as Chief Minister has been marked by bold decisions—modernising infrastructure, enhancing law and order, and cultivating cultural pride. His commitment to education and skill development highlights his belief that youth empowerment is key to societal advancement. It is ironic, then, that a leader who champions education should find his own qualifications under suspicion. But perhaps this is the inevitable cost of public service. The higher one rises, the more one is scrutinised.
Yet, the people of Assam are not easily misled by idle speculation. They evaluate leaders based on action, not insinuation. Dr Sarma’s successive electoral victories and enduring popularity are evidence of this public discernment. Trust is not given—it is earned, and Dr Sarma has done so through consistent dedication and tangible outcomes. In the face of such merit, doubts over academic degrees appear trivial.
There is, however, a broader societal lesson. In a culture that often values titles over substance, we must remember that true education is about character, vision, and applied wisdom. Degrees are symbolic; their real worth lies in how knowledge is used. By this measure, Dr Sarma is an exemplar of how academic learning, when paired with vision and action, can drive meaningful change.
We must also recognise the silent work of mentors. The role of Professor Dr Niru Hazarika in guiding Dr Sarma reminds us that great educators nurture greatness. Her reflections on his commitment are not mere compliments but affirmations of his genuine scholarly spirit. Academic excellence, as this relationship shows, can thrive even amid public responsibilities.
Ultimately, the debate over Dr Sarma’s LL.B. or PhD is a distraction from the real narrative—his contribution to Assam’s progress. Instead of questioning his qualifications, we should engage with his policies, critique where necessary, and contribute to a healthier political dialogue. Democracy flourishes not through gossip, but through informed and reasoned discourse.
In the final reckoning, such allegations say more about the accusers than the accused. They reflect a mindset threatened by achievement and incapable of celebrating merit. But history is a fair judge. Dr Himanta Biswa Sarma’s legacy will not be shaped by falsehoods but by his tangible contributions to Assam. His transformative governance across education, infrastructure, healthcare, and cultural preservation is his true credential.
As citizens, we must rise above trivial controversies. We must ask: Are our leaders improving lives, safeguarding the environment, protecting our culture, and promoting growth? Dr Sarma answers these questions not with rhetoric but with action. His qualifications are not just documents in a file—they are etched in the progress of Assam.
Great leaders endure baseless criticism, but their work endures longer. In Dr Sarma’s case, history will remember not the doubt—but the difference.